Africa-Led Vote, Shifts Global Power Dynamics As UN-Habitat Adopts Strategic Plan 

By Adamu S Ladan 
 

In a landmark but contentious decision, the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) has officially adopted its Strategic Plan for 2026–2029. 

The vote-based adoption—strongly championed by the Africa Group—broke from the tradition of consensus, drawing criticism from the United States but hailed by developing nations as a necessary evolution in global governance.

The Plan aims to tackle the global housing crisis, which affects an estimated 2.8 billion people, by focusing on three transformative pillars: Inclusive Prosperity, Preparedness and Reconstruction, and Climate Sustainability.

The Africa Group, with broad support from other developing regions, drove the momentum for the plan’s adoption, citing urgency in responding to mounting urban challenges across the Global South.

Speaking shortly after the vote, Nigeria’s Honourable Minister of Housing and Urban Development, Arc Ahmed Musa Dangiwa, praised the process and substance of the Strategic Plan:
 

“This is a major victory for equity in global urban development. Africa’s urban needs can no longer be sidelined. The Strategic Plan gives voice to our realities and puts us on a path to sustainable, inclusive progress.”

Echoing this sentiment,  most diplomats of the Africa Group at the UN-Habitat Assembly, hailed the development as one of them said:
 

“Consensus is ideal, but justice is essential. The vote reflects a democratic affirmation of our priorities. For too long, the Global South has waited. Today, we acted.”

The United States delegation, while acknowledging the importance of the Plan’s content, sharply criticized the process by which it was adopted. A senior U.S. official described the move as “disappointing and counterproductive”, arguing that the absence of consensus undermines the spirit of multilateralism.
 

“We support the vision of inclusive urban development, but the manner of adoption threatens the cohesion necessary for implementing it effectively,” the delegate noted.

Observers suggest the U.S. may now shift focus toward influencing implementation, leveraging its financial contributions and partnerships to shape the direction of programming.

UN-Habitat Executive Director, Anaclaudia Rossbach acknowledged the division but emphasized the agency’s commitment to delivering on its mandate:
 

“ We are committed to working with all partners, regardless of the path taken to this moment.”

The outcome of the Assembly has prompted broader reflection on the state of global cooperation. Analysts view the vote as a signal of shifting power dynamics, where emerging economies are increasingly asserting their interests within multilateral institutions.

 Roosevel Chibudhom of Nigeria Mission in Kenya, and one of strong pillars of the Africa Group noted:
“That the development has real implications for how global development priorities are set and executed.”

As implementation of the Strategic Plan begins, the challenge will lie in maintaining cohesion and securing the resources necessary to deliver on its bold ambitions. The Plan’s emphasis on inter-agency collaboration and SDG alignment offers a roadmap for progress—but only if geopolitical tensions do not derail execution.

For the Africa Group and its allies, the vote marks a defining moment—proof that their collective voice can shape the global agenda. For the United States and others, it serves as a call to reengage diplomatically to preserve consensus without stifling reform.
 

In a world of deepening urban crises and shifting alliances, the adoption of the UN-Habitat Strategic Plan may be remembered not just for its contents, but for how it redefined the rules of international cooperation.
 

The Easter Message from Minister of State for Housing and Urban Development, Hon. Yusuf Abdullahi Ata.

As Christians celebrate the resurrection of Jesus Christ, I extend my warmest Easter wishes to all Nigerians. This joyous occasion reminds us of the triumph of life over death, hope over despair, and love over hate.

Let us also acknowledge the struggles and challenges that many of our fellow citizens face. We must recognize the plight of those who are still searching for a safe and affordable home, a basic necessity that is essential to human dignity.

As Minister of State for Housing and Urban Development, I am committed to addressing these challenges and ensuring that every Nigerian has access to decent and affordable housing. We are working tirelessly to implement policies and programs that will increase the availability of affordable housing units, improve the quality of existing housing stock, and promote sustainable urban development.

Let us also renew our commitment to building a better Nigeria for all. Let us strive to create a society that is just, equitable, and prosperous for every citizen. Let us work together to ensure that our cities and towns are safe, clean, and livable for all.

Once again, I wish you a happy Easter. May this blessed occasion bring you joy, peace, and prosperity. May we emerge from this Easter season with a renewed sense of purpose and a deeper commitment to building a brighter future for ourselves and for generations to come.

-  Minister of State for Housing and Urban Development, Hon. Yusuf Abdullahi Ata.
 

OPENING REMARKS BY THE PERMANENT SECRETARY, FEDERAL MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, DR. SHUAIB M.L. BELGORE, NPOM, OON AT THE NATIONAL LANDS REGISTRATION AND DOCUMENTATION PROGRAMME HELD ON 19TH MARCH 2025, AT TRANSCORP HILTON HOTEL, ABUJA 

PROTOCOLS 

1.0    I am honoured to make opening remarks at this pivotal National Lands Registration and Documentation Programme. This gathering is a significant step toward strengthening Nigeria’s land administration system, a crucial factor in promoting economic growth, social stability, and national development. I extend my heartfelt appreciation to all our distinguished guests and stakeholders who have taken the time to be here today. 

2.0   The Theme of this programme speaks directly to one of the most pressing challenges in Nigeria’s housing and urban development sector—Land Registration and Documentation more especially, Sub-Saharan African Countries. As we are all aware, land ownership and security of tenure remains fundamental to sustainable urban development, real estate investment, agricultural productivity, and infrastructure development. 

3.0   The National Lands Registration and Documentation Programme is a response to these longstanding challenges. This initiative, spearheaded by the Federal Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, seeks to advocate for the modernization and streamlining of land registration processes across the country by harmonizing land records, digitizing documentation systems, and enhancing accessibility to land information.

 The key objectives of this programme include: 

i. Ensuring a unified and efficient Land Registration System by working closely with State Governments and Land Actors and Agencies with the view of creating a standardized approach that will reduce duplication, inconsistencies, and bureaucratic bottlenecks. 

ii. Leveraging Technology for land digitization which aims at the transition from manual to digital land records that improves data security, minimize fraudulent activities, and facilitate ease of doing business in the real estate and mortgage sectors in line with global best practices. 

iii. Providing legal certainty and security of tenure to attain proper land documentation. Landowners will have the assurance of legal protection, thereby fostering confidence in land transactions. 

iv. Enhancing investment opportunities in a well-structured land registration system that will unlock potential of land assets, enabling access to credit facilities and boosting investments in housing, agriculture, and infrastructure.

v. Reducing Land Disputes and Promoting Social Stability in a clear, well-documented land titles system to reduce land-related conflicts that have hindered development and economic prosperity in many communities.

 4.0   I am using this medium to laud the significant initiative of the Honourable Minister, Federal Ministry of Housing and Urban Development in driving this process. I will also use this opportunity to thank the State Governments, the World Bank, Organizers of this programme and all collaborating institutions for their commitment to addressing this critical issue. The road ahead may be challenging, but with collective efforts, strategic planning, and sustained commitment, we can establish a land registration system we can be proud of. 

5.0  Once again, I warmly welcome you all and look forward to a productive and insightful engagement. 

Thank you, and God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria. 

KEYNOTE ADDRESS BY THE HON. MINISTER OF HOUSING AT THE STAKEHOLDER FORUM ON DEVELOPMENT OF FISCAL INCENTIVES FOR MANUFACTURERS OF LOCAL BUILDING MATERIALS COMPONENTS IN NIGERIA

Protocols:

1. I want to start by underscoring the importance of building materials in the overall cost of constructing a house.

2. On average, building materials account for approximately 50% to 70% of the total cost of building a house.

3. Cement alone can account for 15% to 20% of the total cost, while steel and reinforcement materials make up another 10% to 15%.

4. Roofing materials account for 5% to 10%, doors, windows, and finishes can take up 10% to 15%, and electrical and plumbing materials round off with 5% to 10%.

5. Sand, gravel, and aggregates contribute 5% to 10%, and blocks and bricks add another 5% to 10%.

6. These figures highlight a clear reality: the cost of building materials is a major determinant of housing affordability. If we can reduce the cost of these materials through local production and strategic fiscal incentives, we can significantly lower the overall cost of housing construction. This, in turn, will make housing more accessible to the average Nigerian.

7. The issue of boosting local manufacturing of building materials has been a longstanding one. It is worth noting that the Building Materials Producers Association of Nigeria (BUMPAN) was formally established on 24th March 2004, with the objective of identifying, mobilizing, and sensitizing small and medium domestic producers of building materials and components to the challenges and economic potential.

8. BUMPAN was envisioned to lay a solid foundation for the development of robust, effective, and economically viable small and medium-scale industries for the production of building materials.

9. It was also expected to facilitate the production of affordable, target-priced houses that would be within the reach of contributors to the National Housing Fund.

10. Similarly, BUMPAN was designed to provide backward and forward linkages in housing production, encompassing building materials and the associated small and medium-scale industries. These industries were to offer employment opportunities, create wealth, and contribute to the economic progress of the country.

11. Today, for so many reasons,  we cannot really point to what BUMPAN has achieved.

12. The local manufacturing of building materials has the potential to create thousands of jobs, stimulate economic growth, and reduce our reliance on imported materials. By supporting local manufacturers, we can foster innovation, improve quality, and reduce costs, making housing more affordable for Nigerians.

13. Local production of building materials will directly contribute to reducing the cost of construction, thereby making housing more accessible to the average Nigerian. This aligns with the Federal Government’s commitment to providing affordable housing for all.

14. As we discussed yesterday, the government is actively working to establish building materials manufacturing hubs across the country. These hubs will serve as centralized locations where manufacturers can access shared infrastructure, reduce production costs, and benefit from economies of scale.

15. The rationale behind this initiative is clear: by clustering manufacturers in designated hubs, we can create a synergistic environment that fosters collaboration, innovation, and efficiency. These hubs are to also provide access to modern technology, training programs, and research and development facilities, enabling manufacturers to produce high-quality materials that meet international standards.

16.  Moreover, the hubs will be strategically located to ensure easy access to raw materials and distribution networks, further reducing transportation costs and enhancing competitiveness.

17. In this regard, the suggestions yesterday  that these hubs should be established in existing free trade zone areas is worthy of serious consideration. Free trade zones already offer significant advantages, such as tax incentives, reduced regulatory burdens, and access to markets. By leveraging these zones, we can accelerate the establishment of manufacturing hubs, reduce initial setup costs, and attract both local and foreign investments.

18. Additionally, empowering producers of key materials like cement to scale up their operations at their existing locations is another viable option. By providing targeted support to these producers, such as access to affordable financing, tax incentives, and infrastructure improvements, we can enable them to increase production capacity, lower costs, and meet the growing demand for building materials without the need for entirely new hubs. This approach not only reduces the cost and time required to deploy new hubs but also maximizes the use of existing resources and infrastructure.

19. We are taking this route because we recognize that local manufacturers of building materials face several challenges, including high production costs due to inadequate infrastructure, limited access to affordable financing, competition from imported materials, and inconsistent government policies and regulations.

20. These challenges have hindered the growth of the sector and limited its contribution to the economy. That is why we are taking proactive steps to create an enabling environment for local manufacturers.

21. Fiscal incentives are one of the most effective tools at our disposal. These incentives can include tax holidays or reduced tax rates for local manufacturers, customs duty waivers on the importation of machinery and raw materials, grants and subsidies to scale up production, access to affordable financing through low-interest loans, and public-private partnerships to drive innovation and growth. I am sure that more on this will be discussed at this session.

22. In conclusion, the development of fiscal incentives for manufacturers of local building materials is not just a policy option; it is a necessity for the growth of our economy and the realization of our housing goals.

23. Thank you for your attention, and I look forward to a productive discussion.

God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.